Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad v. Chicago Portrait Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Craighead Circuit Court; Allen Hughes, Judge; statement by the court. This is a suit by appellee against appellant for the loss of four boxes of picture frames and pictures alleged to have been, lost and converted by. appellant, to appellee’s damage, etc.
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, J.,
(aifter stating the facts.) The appellant abstracts the pleadings in the case, but fails to abstract the evidence. Only the testimony of two witnesses (both for appellant) is abstracted, while the testimony of appellee, plaintiff below, upon which the verdict and judgment- were rendered, is not abstracted at all. None of the instructions were abstracted, although it is shown by a statement in appellant’s brief (“the court in its ninth instruction said”) that at least nine instructions were given. . Appellant complains of the refusal of the court to give its third request for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railway Co. v. AmosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Shorter University v. FranklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Koch v. KimberlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Hardie v. BissellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Carpenter v. HammerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- London v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Siloam Springs v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- International Order of Twelve, Knights & Daughters of Tabor v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942