Meyers v. Russell

The first objection taken, that the amended statement made in the Circuit Court constituted a different cause of action to the one tried before the Justice of the Peace, is not tenable. They were both identically the same, so far as the cause of action was concerned. They were both predicated upon the same items, and expressed the same amounts, only the statement filed in the Circuit Court was more definite and precise.

The defendant moved to quash a deposition taken in the cause before a Notary Public, because it was not properly attested with the notarial seal, which motion the Court…