McCammon v. Cunningham
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The appellant instituted this proceeding-under section 2545, R. S. 1881, to the end that it might be adj udged that the appellee was a person- of unsound mind, and incapable of managing his own estate, and having íd view further the appointment of a guardian to take the custody of the appellee’s person, and. the management of his estate.
Upon an issue made as the statute directs, a jury, after hearing the evidence and instructions of the court, returned as their verdict, “that the defendant, James Cunningham, is a person of sound mind and capable of managing his own estate.”
It is now claimed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Willett v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Eggers v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Lackey v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
3Cited by9 opinions
- Snyder v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Hamrick v. State ex rel. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Wallis v. LuhringIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Fish v. DeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Shafer v. ShaferIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.