Legal Opinion

McKinney v. City of East St. Louis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 7, 1963No. Gen. 62-O-27PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheineman, P. J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, McKinney, in tbe amount of $3200 for back pay for services rendered as a police officer of tbe defendant, City of East St. Louis.

Some months prior to this suit there had been an Administrative Review Proceeding, in the same Court, involving this plaintiff and the Board of Pire and Police Commissioners of the same city, wherein a final order was entered that plaintiff be paid eight months back pay at his regular monthly rate, and no appeal was taken from that judgment.

In the present suit, the essential allegations of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Elmhurst v. KegerreisIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ward v. Field Museum of Natural HistoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Patton Ex Rel. Lewis v. DumpsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Jose Garcia v. Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Police Pension Board, and George SteinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Dowrick v. Village of Downers GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API