United States v. Marshall
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
Here, the Court must determine whether the blotter paper upon which chemical LSD is sprayed is to be included in calculating the drug’s weight.
If so, then the amount far exceeds the ten grams required to kick in the enhanced sentencing provision, whereas if not, no enhanced sentencing provision applies.
The only real issue presented to the Court by this stipulated bench trial is whether Defendant distributed sufficient lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) to fall within the enhanced sentencing provision of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(B)(v), which calls for a minimum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Narcisa SavinovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William E. Wood, A/K/A Steve BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Kipp Michael McGeehan United States of America v. Timothy Steven JovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. BishopDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1989
- People v. NewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Stanley J. Marshall, United States of America v. Richard L. Chapman, John M. Schoenecker, and Patrick BrummCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Brian Michael DalyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Everett Aaron Brown, United States of America v. Jerry Lee DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert A. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.