Legal Opinion

Rodriguez-Lopez v. Triple-S Vida, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 1, 2017No. 15-2413PPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Nilda Rodríguez-Ló-pez (“Rodriguez”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Triple-S Vida, Inc. (“Triple-S”). The district court reviewed and sustairiéd Triple-S’s denial of Rodriguez’s claim for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard. Because the plan contained no clear delegation of authority to Triple-S, we hold that TripleS’s decision was not entitled to deference. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court to decide the case…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Michael F. Terry v. Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hogan v. SPAR Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. M. v. Premera Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. Fortier v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. Ramos v. VizcarrondoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
  5. Cole v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API