Legal Opinion

State v. Peregrina

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2011No. 37900Published

1Opinion of the Court

261 P.3d 815 (2011)

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Diego Morales PEREGRINA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 37900.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2011 Term.

September 7, 2011.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason C. Pintler argued.

Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. John C. McKinney argued.

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case arises out of Diego Morales Peregrina's conviction for two counts of aggravated battery and two firearm enhancements; one for each battery. Peregrina argues that there was insufficient evidence to…

Also in this document: Dissent · Jones; Dissent · Horton.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API