Legal Opinion

Frazier v. RUSKIN

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1964No. Appeal, 183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The defendants have appealed from a refusal of their motions for judgment n.o.v. and new trial following a verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendant Dora Ruskin, on December 29, 1955, executed a lease-sale agreemént with the plaintiff and his wife under which they agreed to buy premises at 1444 North Fifty-Eighth Street, Philadelphia, for $8500. The buyers agreed to pay- $600 at the signing of the agreement and $85 monthly thereafter on account of principal and interest until $2550 had been paid on account of the purchase price. The seller agreed that when the balance due on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hewes v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Weldon & Kelly Co. v. Pavia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Bair Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Health Maintenance OrganizationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Cercone v. CerconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Line Lexington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. Pennsylvania Publishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Citizens Bank v. Maizel, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. PACCAR Financial v. WaterboyzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API