Legal Opinion

Young v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 24, 1972No. 24653PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

This is a companion case to Constantine v. People, 178 Colo. 16, 495 P.2d 208. Young and Constantine were charged and tried jointly with unnatural carnal copulation and conspiracy to commit the same. A third individual was charged with the same offenses, but he was not tried. He testified for the People. The cases of the two defendants were severed for purposes of appeal. We discern no error and therefore affirm.

I

The issues on appeal here have commonality with only one of the issues in Constantine — the validity of the in-court identification of the defendant by the victim. What was said in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goddard v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Segura v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Constantine v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Marshall v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Winters v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Beacom Ex Rel. Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. People v. LamiratoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. People v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API