Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2004, which, to the extent appealed *183from, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and plaintiffs motion denied.

The award of partial summary judgment in plaintiffs favor was inappropriate, since defendants had not had the opportunity to hold a General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing or other discovery (see Fisher v Ciarfella, 300 AD2d 1028 [2002]; Mc-Glynn v Palace Co., 262 AD2d 116 [1999]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGlynn v. Palace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Fisher v. CiarfellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API