Legal Opinion

Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center v. United States

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 21, 1989No. CIV-87-1524-PHX-RGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STRAND, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action arises out of the implementation of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (“AHCCCS”), Arizona’s experimental alternative to traditional medicaid. Plaintiffs are corporations that have provided and continue to provide health care goods and services in Arizona. This action was filed in federal court pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2674 and § 1346(b). The defendant in this action is the United States of America.

The gravamen of the plaintiff’s second amended complaint is that the Secretary of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beno v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Phoenix Baptist Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Beno v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Opinion No. (1995), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API