Legal Opinion

In re: Antoinette Michelle Maxwell

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2019No. BAP OR-18-1286-KuFS; Bk. 3:17-bk-32084-DWH; Adv. 3:17-ap-03113-DWHPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURTZ, Bankruptcy Judge:

For several years, the State of Oregon (State) gave food stamp and public assistance *65 benefits to debtor, Antoinette Michelle Maxwell, based on earned and unearned income reported in her benefit applications. State later discovered that Ms. Maxwell failed to report all her income and thus received benefits to which she was not entitled.

State filed an adversary proceeding against Ms. Maxwell seeking a determination that the overpayments were nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2). After a trial and supplemental briefing by the parties, the bankruptcy court issued a Letter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. ApplingSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carnes v. JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  2. D.L. Evans Bank v. EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2021
  3. Kessler v. LongmireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Kessler v. LongmireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Lin v. HuntUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API