Legal Opinion

Higman v. Hood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1892No. 334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, C. J. —

The appellant commenced this action against the appellees for commission alleged to be owing him from the appellees upon a sale of real estate owned by the appellees in the city of Muncie, Indiana, made by the appellant as the agent of the appellees. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was upon a written contract executed by the appellees to a firm of real estate agents in the city of Muncie, of which firm the appellant was the successor, and as such became the owner of said contract, which was filed with and made a part of the complaint.

The second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Lane v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Potter v. EarnestIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. WannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. FERRIS REALTY CO. v. ABCO Signs, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. United States Benevolent Society v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Webb v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Ferris Realty, Inc. v. ABCO Signs, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API