Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1993No. 13-92-243-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Richard Rodriguez, guilty of the offense of burglary of a habitation. After finding that he had been previously convicted of one felony, the jury assessed his punishment at life in prison, plus a $5,000 fine. The jury also found that he used a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. By four points of error, appellant complains that the trial court excluded relevant evidence and improperly instructed the jury, and he attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s deadly weapon finding. We affirm.

The State’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  3. David Meza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Martins, Alex Sander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  5. Stephanie Kizima v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API