Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Davenport-Metcalf

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 21, 2004No. 2003-431-AppealPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Lester Hoffman and Anne L. Mishley (collectively, plaintiffs), appeal pro se from a Superior Court grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Berkeley Manor d/b/a Newport Green Associates (Berkeley Manor) and Judy Davenport-Metcalf (collectively, defendants). This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After examining the briefs of the parties1 and the record of the proceedings below, we conclude that cause has not been…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bourg v. Bristol Boat Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Swerdlick v. KochSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  3. Donna Reilly v. United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  4. Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Palazzo v. AlvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Fiorenzano v. LimaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. Ims v. Town of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Doe v. Brown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  5. Doe v. Brown Univ.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API