Legal Opinion
E. J. Albrecht Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 3, 1947No. 9210PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff brought an action for damages against New Amsterdam Casualty Company alleging breach of a construction sub-contract between plaintiff and William Dush-ney. The complaint was filed against New Amsterdam, because, as surety, it had executed a bond running to plaintiff, with Dushney as principal, for the faithful performance of the sub-contract. Dushney (also referred to as defendant and counter-claimant) thereupon moved and was granted leave to intervene as a party-defendant. He filed an answer and counterclaim denying liability as to plaintiff and alleging his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Aircraft Gear Corp. v. Kaman Aerospace Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
- Belvidere Distilling Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- E. J. Albrecht Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.