Skinner v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MANN, Judge.
Skinner was seriously injured in an accident. His employer had a policy providing to employees certain benefits upon a showing of disability resulting from accident or illness. The language is fairly common, and is set out in the margin.1 The insurer paid Skinner for the two years that he was disabled from performance of his regular *578job, and thereafter claimed that, while he may not have been able to perform his regular job, he was not “prevented by reason of said injury from engaging in each and every occupation or employment for wage or profit for which he is reasonably…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bouvier v. Craftsman InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Nelson v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1970
- Grau v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Coburn v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. BunchMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Kolwicz v. American Health & Life InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979