Legal Opinion

Mott v. Hopper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1906No. 15,821PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action by William Mott against Sam and John Hopper. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and defendants applied for certiorari or writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiff sued to be maintained in possession of 80 acres of land and to recover damages for the value of timber alleged to have been cut thereon by the defendants. Plaintiff prayed for and obtained a writ of injunction to prevent further trespass and disturbance of his alleged possession. The action as brought was purely possessory, the plaintiff merely alleging possession as-owner for a number of years.

Defendants, for answer, pleaded a general denial, and further alleged possession in themselves as owners under a chain of title which they set forth. The answer further assailed the homestead…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Sallier v. BartleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Gibson v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  4. Nicol v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  5. Gillard v. GlennSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holden v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Producers' Oil Co. v. HanszenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. Grant Timber & Mfg. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  5. Smith v. Grant Timber & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API