Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This is a motion for a temporary injunction in an action to restrain the city of New York and the members of the board of estimate and apportionment from interfering with the plaintiff’s continuance in office as commissioner of records. A similar motion is made in an action by plaintiff Philip F. Donohue, who is a member of the board of water supply. As the facts in both cases are parallel and the issues of law involved identical, both motions will be treated together in this opinion.

Each plaintiff is seventy-six years old, and both are members of the New York city employees’ retirement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People ex rel. MacMahon v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  5. Achley's CaseNew York Supreme Court · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lazarus v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API