Legal Opinion

Stryszko v. Department of Employment & Training

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 10, 1984No. 83-108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant appeals from a decision of the Employment Security Board (Board) disqualifying her from unemployment compensation benefits. The Board found she left her employment voluntarily and without good cause. 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a) (2) (A). We affirm.

The claimant maintains that her employer, Service Master Building Services of Williston, Vermont (employer), promised to provide her transportation to and from work and that this promise was part of her contract of employment. This promise, she contends, was made by the employer’s supervisor at the time of hiring. Claimant rode to work with this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. LaFountain v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. Seymour v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. Wheeler v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  4. Hill v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Spaulding v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. Littlefield v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API