Legal Opinion

Hartzler v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 31, 1909PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — How. II. L. McCune, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLamm, P. J.

Plaintiff sues for $10,000 for the wrongful death of his wife — his action obviously grounded on the amendment to section 2864 of the old Damage Act (Laws 1905, p. 135, el seq.) — and recovers $4,000. The answer is a plain general denial and an allegation of contributory negligence. Dp to the moment of verdict and judgment, no constitutional guarantee was invoked by defendant. In a motion for a new trial defendant, for the first time, raised a constitutional question below. Point eight of that motion runs:

“The court denied to this defendant in the giving of the instructions numbered 1 and 5…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Ash v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. State v. GammaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Shell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Magenheim v. Board of Education of School District of Riverview GardensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Hays v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API