Legal Opinion

United States v. Arellano-Sandoval

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2013No. 11-2023, 11-2031UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Brothers Ricardo and Javier Arellano-Sandoval both pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(D), and one count of illegal reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826(a), (b). Because the district court found that Messrs. Arellano-Sandoval had each previously been convicted of a crime of violence, the district court applied a sixteen-level sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2, and imposed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Martin Barcenas-YanezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API