Keeler v. DeWitt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 5, Jan. T., 1904, by defendant, from order of C. P. Wyoming Co., Oct. T., 1901, No. 43, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Asa S. Keeler, Assignee, v. W. W. DeWitt. Rule to open judgment. The facts appear in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beavek, J.,
By an agreement in writing, the defendant contracted with H. A. Crandall, as foreman, for the erection upon his house and barn of a system of circuit conductors, in ordinary parlance known as lightning rods, which were to be erected “ in a proper and substantial manner, in accordance with the scientific rules set forth on the back of this contract,” for which he was to pay, on the completion of the work, in cash or by note due in one year, at the rate, of thirty-seven and one half cents per foot for the rod. Upon the back of said contract, among numerous other clauses,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Harvey v. DimonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908