Legal Opinion
Kaul v. Hanover Direct, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 2004No. 01 CIV. 6810(DC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this case, plaintiff Rakesh K. Kaul, the former President and Chief Executive Officer of defendant Hanover Direct, Inc. (“Hanover”), sues the company he once headed to recover compensation that he claims should have been paid to him under various employment agreements and benefit plans. Before the Court are three motions: (1) Hanover’s motion for summary judgment dismissing all of Kaul’s claims and in its favor on a counterclaim for monies purportedly owed by Kaul, (2) Kaul’s motion for partial summary judgment striking certain of Hanover’s affirmative defenses…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- McGuire v. Russell Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Duff v. Trenton Beverage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Levison v. WeintraubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benicorp Insurance v. National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Vetromile v. JPI PARTNERS, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Shub v. Westchester Community CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Quinio v. AalaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018