Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1983No. AK-455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Taylor appeals from a conviction for the offense of robbery with a firearm, contending that the lower court erred in failing to give Standard Jury Instruction 2.04(b), pertaining to accomplices. We affirm.

The person whom the defense claims was an accomplice was in fact the chief prosecuting witness who placed the defendant at the scene of the robbery, but himself denied any involvement. Nevertheless, the witness was seen fleeing the getaway car, along with three other persons, shortly following the robbery with a firearm in his possession. Two of the four were then wearing blue coats. The…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodyard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API