Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1939No. 6633Published

1Dissent

The substance of appellant's assignment of error as to the court's ruling and remark during the impaneling of the jury, as argued in his brief, challenged the comment, not the ruling, and I agree the comment was not harmful.

Conceding that specific instances may not be shown to prove reputation, even a superficial perusal of the record shows no prejudice resulted from the slight infraction of the rule herein, in which event a reversal is not justified. (State v.Gallagher, 14 Idaho 656, 94 P. 581; State v. Ray, 32 Idaho 363,182 P. 857; State v. Bubis, 39 Idaho 376, 227 P. 384; Statev.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. OrrIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. RedingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. WalnIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. MushrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API