Legal Opinion

State v. . Cagle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s motion for nonsuit was properly denied. As was said in S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637: “We could not nonsuit tbe State, . . . for when there is a killing with a deadly weapon, as there was in this case, tbe law implies malice, and it is, at least, murder in second degree, and the burden then rests upon the prisoner to satisfy the jury of facts and circumstances in mitigation of or excuse for the homicide, the credibility of the evidence, and its sufficiency to produce this satisfaction being for the jury to consider and decide.”

The defendant excepted to several portions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . ReddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Neuse Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API