Sekulov v. City of Warren
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTalbot, J.
I would affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for both defendants. I agree that summary disposition was properly granted in favor of defendant city of Warren for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. However, I would also affirm the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant Macomb County on the basis of Nawrocki v Macomb Co Rd Comm, 463 Mich 143; 615 NW2d 702 (2000), and Hanson v Mecosta Co Rd Comm’rs, 465 Mich 492; 638 NW2d 396 (2002), which I believe apply retroactively and are dispositive of plaintiff’s claims.
In determining whether the general…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Lindsey v. Harper HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.