Legal Opinion

Hamburger v. Kramp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 37,765PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill herein was filed to obtain a decree maintaining the integrity of building restrictions imposed upon lots in a subdivision.

Upon the hearing the court found that, by reason of violations and changed conditions, it would be inequitable to maintain the restriction on defendant’s lot in the subdivision facing Schoolcraft avenue ; that plaintiff Charles Hamburger had violated the restrictions elsewhere on the plat and upon a lot facing Schoolcraft avenue on an adjoining plat, and plaintiffs were moved by desire to prevent competition on the part of defendant with a nearby gasoline filling…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Dipboye v. AcchioneMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Smith v. First United Presbyterian ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Simons v. Work of God Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API