Legal Opinion

Crownhart v. Tracy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1907Published

.Appeal by William Gf. Tracy and Augustus T. Armstrong, as receivers, etc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of Fred B. Crownhart, the plaintiff in -actions Nos. 1 and 2, and one of the defendants in action No. 3, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Onondaga on the 1st day of October, 1906, upon the 'report of a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtRobson, J.

By agreement the three actions involved in the judgment appealed from were tried together before the referee, to whom they had been duly referred. But one report was made by the referee in disposing of all the actions, by which, however, he directed specifically the judgment to be entered in the consolidated actions Nos. 1 and 2, and also fhe judgment to be entered in action No. 3, Only one judgment was entered on this report, which purports to adjudicate the rights of the various parties to the separate actions, in which, it will be observed, the parties are not the same and the relief,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winne v. . WinneNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Frain v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API