Legal Opinion

Catterlin v. Somerville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Clinton Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Fowler and Earl had a judgment against Somerville and others. Before its full satisfaction, the defendants paid to Sims, attorney, for Foioler and Earl, 100 dollars •on the judgment, taking a receipt which specified that the amount was paid to be credited on the judgment. Sims paid the 100 dollars to Catterlin, the agent of Fowler and Earl. It was not credited on the judgment. Afterwards an execution was taken out by Fowler and Earl, upon their judgment, and the whole amount collected from Somerville and others, the defendants in the judgment.

This suit is by Somerville and others against…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wisner v. BulkleyNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heddens v. YoungloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Trimble v. PollockIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Baker v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Pence v. MakepeaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Fall River County v. Minnekahta State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API