Legal Opinion

Wurtz v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1975No. 36584PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Defendants appeal from the award of attorney fees in favor of plaintiffs.

On December 23, 1972, the defendants executed and delivered to plaintiffs a promissory note for the sum of $90,000. The note was due thirty days after date, and was payable to the order of the plaintiffs. The note bore an interest rate of eight percent per year after maturity. The note also provided that the makers agreed to pay “all costs, expenses and fees of collection (including fees for legal services or advice) in case payment is not made at maturity.”

On May 31, 1974, after a lawsuit, deposition, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Kansas City v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Scott v. Home Mutual Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Billinger v. JostMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. L. H. Y. v. J. M. Y.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. De Paul Hospital School of Nursing, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Stenzel v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Brand v. BrandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. B______ v. B______Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API