Legal Opinion

Faria v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 5, 1995No. 95-1603Published

1Per curiam

Defendant seeks review of a denial of post-conviction relief alleging several grounds for relief, among which is the contention that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to two separate three-year minimum mandatory terms. We find this point to be well taken and hereby strike the second three-year minimum mandatory sentence as to the robbery with a knife. State v. Rodriguez, 602 So.2d 1270 (Fla.1992); Stripling v. State, 602 So.2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Belcher v. State, 550 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Peck v. State, 425 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). As this issue was not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Dowdell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Peck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Belcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API