Legal Opinion

Jones v. Keebey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This is an action instituted by appellee against appellant to recover possession of two diamond rings. Appellee is a dealer in jewelry and gems, and he sold the rings in controversy to appellant’s husband, B. W. Jones. The sale was on credit, except a small amount paid, and Jones executed two notes for the purchase price of the rings, each of the notes stipulating that the title to the rings was retained by appellee until the purchase price should be paid in full. Neither of these notes has ever been paid. Jones gave the rings to appellant as a wedding present. Appellant and Jones have since…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thornton v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Neal v. ConeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Bell v. OldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Jones v. KeebeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Ames Iron Works v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. D. W. Griffith, Inc. v. LoughmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API