State v. Ford
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. G. H. STtinker, Special Jndgé. (1) The court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer interposed at the close of the evidence on the part of the State, and again at. the close of the entire eviclence.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. G. H. STtinker, Special Jndgé. (1) The court erred in overruling the defendant’s demurrer interposed at the close of the evidence on the part of the State, and again at. the close of the entire eviclence. (a) The evidence shows conclusively that the information was not filed until more than three years (excluding Hie time tlie defendant was out of the jurisdiction) had elapsed, after the date of the alleged offense on October 29, 1906. R. S. 1909, sec. 4945, 4947; State v. Snyder, 182 Mo.- 462; Nodaway County v. Williams, 199 S. W. 224; McMillan v.…
1Opinion of the CourtDavid E. Blair, J.
After two mistrials appellant was convicted upon the third trial, under the second 'count of an information in accepted form, charging him with the crime of uttering' a forged note, in violation of the provisions of Section 4656, Bevised Statutes 1909 (Sec. 3441, B. S. 1919), and after unsuccessful motion for a new trial was sentenced on the verdict of the jury to imprisonment in the State Penitentiary for a term of three years, and has appealed.
Defendant- gave two notes, for value received, to the Peoples Bank of Aurora, Lawrence County, Missouri, for $2000 and $500 respectively. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SummersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- State v. StokelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. TalamanteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. WhitleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.