Winfield National Bank v. Croco
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Cowley District Court. The facts appear in the opinion. The plaintiff Bank brings to this court for reversal two orders dissolving certain attachments, made by the district judge at chambers, on March 2, 1889.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
Two actions were brought in the district court of Cowley county by the Winfield National Bank against Peter C. Croco. The first was brought upon a promissory note for $5,405, which was not then due; and the second was upon promissory notes which were past due, amounting to $3,731.91. Orders of attachment were obtained by the bank, upon the grounds that the defendant was about to convert a part of his property into money for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors, and had assigned and disposed of his property, or a part…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Monroe v. May, Weil & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
3Cited by12 opinions
- Quinn v. Union Nat. Bank of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Riley v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- First State Bank of Durant v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Shellabarger v. MottinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Gate City National Bank v. GreeneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.