Legal Opinion

Lounsbury v. Ball

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.

Motion denied.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howe v. WildesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
  2. Bogart v. M'DonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1801