Legal Opinion
Lounsbury v. Ball
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1834PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.
Motion denied.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Howe v. WildesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
- Bogart v. M'DonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1801