Legal Opinion

Haven v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 10, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

It is alleged in the bill and admitted by the answer that the plaintiffs, who are nonresidents, brought an action of contract against James F. Smith, domiciled in this Commonwealth, which was entered in the Superior Court for the county of Bristol on May 1, 1922. The single justice by whom the suit was heard finds, that they had an enforceable claim “ for the sum of $5,600 . . . .” But, Smith having died in August, 1922, his will was duly admitted to probate the following September, when the defendants were appointed executors. Due notice of their appointment was *548given, and an affidavit of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emery v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. Sykes v. MeachamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Ewing v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Leach v. LeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. E. S. Parks Shellac Co. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Hastoupis v. GargasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Nichols v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API