Williams v. EMRO Marketing Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Dissent
Judge Harold R. Banke,
dissenting.
Because Williams failed to present any probative admissible evidence as to what caused his unwitnessed fall, I dissent. Before this *473case, it was a well-established principle of Georgia tort law that proof of the occurrence of a fall is not sufficient to establish negligence or give rise to liability. “Falling and injuring one’s self proves nothing. Such happenings are commonplace wherever humans go.” (Punctuation omitted.) Hall v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, 223 Ga. App. 88, 91 (1) (476 SE2d 789) (1996); Wilson v. Duncan, 211 Ga. App. 814, 815 (440 SE2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Pound v. Augusta National, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Kenny v. M & M SUPERMARKETCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.