Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilfong

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2007No. 05-6404PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is, therefore, ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendant Jacob Wilfong was convicted by a jury of conspiring to traffic in and use unauthorized access devices, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aggravated identity theft, -in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l), and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eighty-four months. Wilfong…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. MagallanezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. AngelosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. CespedesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API