Herold v. Estate of Hill
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of Cass County, North Dakota, Honorable Chas. A. Pollock, Judge. Tbe fact that plaintiff in giving bis testimony and relating therein tbe facts as be understood and claimed them to exist, referred to transactions with the deceased, does not render such testimony wholly incompetent and inadmissible.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe District Court of Cass County, North Dakota, Honorable Chas. A. Pollock, Judge. Tbe fact that plaintiff in giving bis testimony and relating therein tbe facts as be understood and claimed them to exist, referred to transactions with the deceased, does not render such testimony wholly incompetent and inadmissible. It is not the law that plaintiff, in such cases, is an incompetent witness on every subject and in reference to everything, otherwise relevant, excepting specific transactions had with the deceased. Banlc v. Hilliboe; ,(N. D.) 114 N. W. 1085. Evidence of…
1Opinion of the CourtGrace, J.
Appeal from the judgment of the district court of Cass county, Charles A. Pollock, Judge.
This is an action for an accounting, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant John A. Hill, as administrator of the estate of George Harrison Hill, deceased.
It appears from the pleadings that plaintiff held a certain crop contract for the purchase of land from one Peter McLachlin, then owner of said land, which land was described-as the east one half of section 27, township 143, range 53, Cass county,"North Dakota. It also appeal’s that during the year 1906, plaintiff and said George Harrison Hill…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bohlman v. Big River Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Thomas C. Roel Associates, Inc. v. HenriksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- National Bank of Harvey v. PaulyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- First National Bank v. LarssonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- National Bank of Harvey v. PaulyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979