Legal Opinion

Mullineaux v. Salem Technical Services, Inc.

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided March 22, 1988No. Case No. (Law) 80393PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE THOMAS A. FORTKORT

The demurrers of Salem Technical Services, Inc., and Aiken Advanced Systems, Inc., and Frank B. Martin, defendants to the amended motion for judgment, are denied. Virginia still adheres to the "employment at will" doctrine most recently reexamined by the Virginia Supreme Court in Justice Russell’s opinion in Miller v. SEVAMP, Inc., 234 Va. 462, 362 S.E.2d 915 (1987).

Virginia currently has no opinions on the doctrine of promissory estoppel in employment contracts, although the doctrine itself has been commented upon. See, for example, Footnote 2, Dial v. Deskins, 221…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sevamp, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. DUNLANY FOODS, INC. v. AyersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  3. Dial v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cordant, Inc. v. Ogden Government Services Corp.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API