Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Moon v. Daugherty

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1979No. 78-436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Because the instant cause originated in a Court of Appeals, this court is obligated, pursuant to Section 2, Article TV of the Ohio Constitution, to review it. Having done so, we find no merit in relator’s appeal. The sole issue raised by Moon is whether mandamus should lie. Mandamus will not lie unless there is a clear legal duty to perform an official act. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, paragraph one of the syllabus. The commission is under no such legal duty to increase Moon’s disability compensation unless the record reveals that its determination not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Ianiro v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API