Legal Opinion

People v. Letizia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously af*1011firmed. Memorandum: The statement that the victim gave to the Crime Victims Compensation Board was not Rosario material (see, CPL 240.45 [1] [a]; People u Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) because the transcript of the testimony was not in the possession or control of the prosecution (see, People v Reedy, 70 NY2d 826, 827; see also, People v Bailey, 73 NY2d 812, 813; People v Tissois, 72 NY2d 75).

The testimony of the victim’s uncle that the victim told him that defendant had participated in the assault was admissible to refute the inference created by defense counsel that the victim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. TissoisNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. ReedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. AlexNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. RaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. FarrellNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. LetiziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API