Legal Opinion

Still v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1971No. 71-C-392 CivPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

After removing this case from the Tulsa County District Court, Defendant raised by Motion a claimed defect of venue in the State proceedings initiated by Plaintiff herein. The Defendant asserts that it is a transportation company within the meaning of 12 Okl.Stat.Ann. § 135 pertaining to venue and claims that none of the requirements of that Statute have been met in this case. 1

Although Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s Motion, he makes no showing that any of the prescribed statutory conditions of venue have been met under 12 Okl.Stat.Ann. § 135. However, he claims…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Pittman v. ComptonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Transure, Inc., a California Corporation Transure, Ltd., a British Corporation v. Marsh and McLennan Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Rossi Sheet Metal Works v. American Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API