Still v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
After removing this case from the Tulsa County District Court, Defendant raised by Motion a claimed defect of venue in the State proceedings initiated by Plaintiff herein. The Defendant asserts that it is a transportation company within the meaning of 12 Okl.Stat.Ann. § 135 pertaining to venue and claims that none of the requirements of that Statute have been met in this case. 1
Although Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s Motion, he makes no showing that any of the prescribed statutory conditions of venue have been met under 12 Okl.Stat.Ann. § 135. However, he claims…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Pittman v. ComptonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transure, Inc., a California Corporation Transure, Ltd., a British Corporation v. Marsh and McLennan Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rossi Sheet Metal Works v. American Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977