Legal Opinion

Cripple Creek State Bank v. Rollestone

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 5, 1921No. 9762PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action against the guarantor of a promissory note. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry J. Hersey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, had judgment in an action against him by, plaintiff in error, as an indorser on a promissory note. The case is here on error to, such judgment.

The cause was tried on a stipulation of facts which discloses that in May, 1911, the bank was the holder of twp promissory notes given to it some time previously which the bank examiner. determined were not good banking risks. He therefore stated to the defendant, who was the cashier of the bank, that said notes must be taken from the list of the bank’s assets. The effect of such action would have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kohn v. Consolidated Butter & Egg Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. E.B. Roberts Construction Co. v. Concrete Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Jett v. Phillips & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Borwick v. BoberColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Brooks v. Land Drilling Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API