Legal Opinion

State v. . Lamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant excepted, not only to the denial of his motion to dismiss the action, but to the following instruction given the jury: “If you are satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, the burden being on the State, that the defendant signed the name of M. P. Mitchell to this order or paper described in the bill of indictment without the authority of M. P. Mitchell; and further, if the State satisfies you from the evidence bdyond a reasonable doubt that he did so with intent to defraud, then it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you are not so satisfied, if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. . MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. State v. WillsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. State v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Nationwide Homes of Raleigh, N. C., Inc. v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. United States v. Gregory Vincent HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API