Legal Opinion

William Trimbey Co. v. Lindblom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

On September 22, 1921, defendant Marie E. Lindblom and her husband, Gustave E. Lindblom, made and delivered to plaintiff their joint and several promissory note, whereby for value received they promised to pay to this plaintiff $1,800 two months after date, at the First National Bank of Utica.

On the 18th day of October, 1921, the same parties made and delivered to this plaintiff their joint and several promissory note for $800, payable two months after date, at the First National Bank of Utica. This note, like the first one, recited that it was given “ for value received.”

These…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maurice v. FowlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  2. Hover v. MagleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sun Forest Corp. v. ShviliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Conde v. TownerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API