Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Love v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1999No. 1999-0969PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 158.] THE STATE EX REL. LOVE, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Love v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor’s Office,

1999-Ohio-314.] Mandamus sought to compel Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office to provide relator certain records relating to his concluded criminal trial—Denial of writ affirmed, when. (No. 99-969—Submitted September 21, 1999—Decided November 10, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 75740. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1981,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Love v. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Kuczak v. SaffoldOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Flagner v. ArkoOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. SpirkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McKeltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. ObermillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. OsieOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API