Legal Opinion

Randolph v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1959No. 2405PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of failing to give full time and attention to the operation of his motor vehicle in violation of Part I, Article XIV, section 99(c), Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia.

In order to understand his contentions on appeal it is necessary to set forth the factual background: On August 31, 1958, appellant, while driving a motor vehicle, struck and injured a pedestrian, one Leroy Stoddard; on September 2, he was charged by the Corporation Counsel with failing to give full time and attention to the operation of his vehicle in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Copening v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. John Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. District of Columbia v. RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Gates v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Schrier v. Home Indemnity CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API